ISP letter to the Archbishop Renato R. Martino

 
The Independent Science Panel (ISP) is a panel of scientists from many disciplines, committed to the Promotion of Science for the Public Good. Read our statement here


Who's on the ISP

Read who is a member on the ISP. Read More


Articles by the ISP

Read More


Campaigns of the
ISP
1. Sustainable World
2. ISP-FP7
3. ISP Report

Archbishop Renato R. Martino
President of the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace
Palazzo San Calisto
Trastevere
Rome
Italy
23 October 2003

Your Excellency,

Please allow me to address you on behalf of the Independent Science Panel (ISP) on Genetic Modification (GM). The ISP consists of two dozen prominent scientists from seven countries, spanning diverse disciplines, and who are concerned to provide critical scientific information to the global debate over genetic engineered crops, in view of its importance for the future of our food and agriculture.

We understand from our colleagues at the Third World Network that the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace is examining the various aspects of the GMO issue from the scientific, ethical and humanitarian perspectives. We are encouraged by your efforts to foster understanding and deepen our knowledge on these new technologies.

In this regard, I am pleased to enclose a copy of the ISP’s report, The Case for a GM Free Sustainable World, which is an extensive review of the scientific and other evidence on the problems and hazards of GM crops and the manifold benefits of all forms of sustainable agriculture. Based on this, we are calling for a global ban on environmental release of GM crops, to make way for agroecology, organic farming and other forms of sustainable agriculture.

It is clear, from the evidence presented in the ISP Report, that there are many unanswered questions on the safety of GM crops. Very few studies have been conducted, particularly as to the effects of GM foods on human health, and the few independent studies that have been carried out raise serious concerns, as pointed out by two recent review papers [1, 2].

Recent research (the ‘farm-scale evaluations’) in the UK further documents how GM crops affect the environment and wildlife negatively. Given the scientific uncertainties and the likelihood that once transgenic crops are released into the environment, transgenic contamination of non-GM crops is inevitable, it is imperative that the Precautionary Principle is applied.

More importantly, there is increasing evidence that many smallholder farmers in developing countries already have the knowledge, experience and innovative spirit that enable them to farm sustainably and productively, without depending on GM crops. We need to learn from them, and this means rethinking agriculture and associated policy making, and exploring how traditional knowledge and science can work together.

We hope that this report contributes to your discussions on GMOs.

Yours Sincerely,

Dr. Mae-Wan Ho
For the Independent Science Panel
PO Box 32097
London NW1 0XR
UK


1. A Pusztai, S Bardocz and SWB Ewen (2003) Genetically Modified Foods: Potential Human Health Effects, Chapter 16 in Food Safety: Contaminants and Toxicants, JPF D'Mello (ed), CABI Publishing.

2. Ian R. Pryme & Rolf Lembcke (2003) In vivo studies on possible health consequences of genetically modified food and food - With particular regard to ingredients consisting of
genetically modified plant materials, Nutrition and Health, 2003, Vol. 17, pp. 1-8.


 
www.indsp.org Web
www.i-sis.org.uk
e-mail:[email protected]
 

© 2003 Independent Science Panel