Pharm crops are genetically modified (GM) crops containing genes from humans,
animals or bacteria that code for products (mainly proteins) used to treat
diseases of humans and animals. In an earlier report on the problems associated
with field tests of pharm crops highlighted the pollution of ground ands
surface water with the pharmaceutically active products(1). Recently, reports
have begun to appear indicating that the pharmaceutical products are extruded
from the GM crops in root exudates in good quantity allowing harvest of
the product from hydroponic media . The products extruded include human
antibody protein from tobacco roots (20 and human and bacterial enzymes
from tobacco (3). Rhizo secretion of pharmaceutical proteins into hydroponic
media may be a safe and effective way of producing proteins continuously
from GM crops with limited threat to the environment.
The study of rhizo secretion also pinpoints an important flaw in the regulation
of field tests and field production of pharm crops. The United states department
of Agriculture (USDA) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS)
who regulate field testing of pharm crops emphasize measures that prevent
spread of pollen from pharm crops but do not consider the measures needed
to prevent groundwater pollution by exudates or plant decay (4) and advisory
meetings on pharm crop testing have not considered the impact on groundwater
(5). The Canadian Food Inspection Agency regulates field testing of pharm
crops in Canada, the agency contracted two reports on Pharm crops , the
first considered plants as bioreactors (6) and that report considered the
need for safety regulations but ignored ground water and the second (7)
dealt with the impact of pharm crops on biodiversity, but even that report
did not deal with the groundwater pollution by pharmaceutical products that
are active in minute quantity. Even though rizosphere secretion is well
studied the North American regulators who permitted numerous field trials
of pharm crops but maintained a n umbrella of confidentiality over the tests
and their results. In London, Ontario tests of a pharm crop of an extremely
potent immune suppressant, interleukin 10, was undertaken without public
notification and no means of alerting residents whose wells would be polluted
to some degree by the pharmaceutical product. The regulators seem to have
been issued “blinders” that make them ignore a most important
pollution source.
The public must be provided with location of field tests for pharm crops
and with the complete monitoring protocol for the field experiments. People
who use water wells and experience new unexplained maladies should consider
looking for field trials in their immediate area (acknowledging that regulators
deal with the tests as confidential studies). The best immediate remedy
from the hazards of the field tests is to restrict future testing to fully
contained facilities.
References are available on request , please state the name of the paper