Summarised by Lim Li Ching
Eating Pesticides and Herbicides too, with GM Foods
Malcolm Hooper asked if we are slowly poisoning ourselves by eating herbicides
and pesticides with GM and other foods. He highlighted the herbicides and pesticides
that are closely related organic compounds of phosphorus - the organophosponates,
including the herbicides glyphosate and glufosinate; and the organophosphates,
including some pesticides.
Hooper explained that the problem lies in the fact that numerous processes
in the body involve phosphate groups. They are used as switches to turn on and
off all kinds of things. As such, processes such as gene activation, glucose
transport, hormone response and energy production could be potentially damaged.
While drugs are usually highly specific with a unique target, herbicides and
pesticides have a universal target in weeds and insects, respectively. Their
goal is a target system(s) that is widespread in insects and plants, so as to
kill as many insects and plants as possible. Hooper warned that the unexpected
always happens, such as side-effects and the lack of discrimination between
‘good’ and ‘bad’ plants, and pests and organisms, especially
humans.
Glufosinate ammonium (the herbicide used in conjunction with Aventis’
Liberty Link GM crops) inhibits glutamine synthetase. Hooper explained that
glutamine synthetase is involved in the pathway that converts glutamate and
ammonia to glutamine. Glufosinate blocks this pathway, which is the only way
most plants remove ammonia. As ammonia is highly toxic to plants, it kills weeds.
However, the pathway is universal and is found in humans, insects and micro-organisms.
In humans and animals, ammonia is also toxic, but mainly removed by a different
pathway.
Nonetheless, the glutamine synthetase pathway is involved in other essential
processes. Glutamine maintains homeostatic balance, especially in the brain,
immune system and gut. It is the body’s most abundant free amino acid.
The gut utilises 40% of the body’s glutamine, which is also the major
fuel for the brain, immune cells, kidneys and liver. Therefore, if the pathway
and synthesis of glutamine were stopped, it would have enormous potential for
damage and destructive imbalance of the system. Glutamine is also involved in
detoxification processes, increases resistance to infection, regulates glucose
metabolism, plays a key role in nucleic acid synthesis, is an anabolic protein
in skeletal muscle and protects against burns, traumas and illness.
The other part of the pathway - glutamate - is also very important.
As glufosinate blocks the conversion of glutamate to glutamine, levels of glutamate
will increase, potentially creating problems. Glutamate plays key roles in humans
and mammals; it is an excitatory neurotransmitter, an excitatory transmitter
in the gut and enteric nervous system and an inhibitory transmitter in the gut
and brain. It is involved in foetal brain development and is important in memory
and learning.
Hooper concluded that it would be difficult to conceive of a more potentially
damaging target that would be destructive to human health and well-being than
the glutamate-glutamine-glutamine synthetase system. He stressed that any disruption
of this finely balanced and essential system by compounds such as glufosinate
will have far-reaching and long-term consequences.
He then cited evidence of the effects of acute, high dosage of glufosinate
in humans: neurotoxicity, convulsions, mental disturbance and memory loss. Its
metabolite is also neurotoxic. Congenital malformations and respiratory failure
have been recorded. Furthermore, the surfactant in the formulation is cardio-toxic.
However, the manufacturer dismisses these concerns, claiming that ultra high
doses are not relevant to toxic effects associated with proper usage. Nonetheless,
high doses are commonly used to tease out major toxicological effects. In the
drug industry, high doses would be tested, and the impacts serve as warnings
to highlight the problems.
Hooper also outlined the negative effects of glufosinate on mice, such as convulsions,
release of nitric oxide (affects many bodily processes), teratogenesis, brain
functional abnormalities and increased mortality. All this is in agreement with
human data. Furthermore, insects, butterflies, fish, soil bacteria, fungi, clams,
oysters and beneficial predatory insects are affected by glufosinate. Inhibition
of beneficial soil bacteria, reduction in activity of nitrogen-fixing bacteria,
reduced cellulose decomposition and more resistant plant pathogens have been
recorded. What would be the knock-on effects on the complex food web?
The accumulation of glufosinate residues on food is cause for concern. Whilst
these levels are generally described as too low to cause any harm, the cumulative
dose received from eating multiple foods, including meat, cannot be ignored.
WHO/FAO figures of residues in food need to be critically assessed, as they
are usually taken from manufacturers and the US (Environment Protection Agency)
EPA, with not much independent verification. Hooper contended that the amounts
in food are high and that combined effects of other residues should also be
considered.
Additionally, the EPA describes glufosinate as a persistent and mobile contaminant.
It persists in soils from three to 42 days depending on the nature of the soil,
and its metabolite leaches twenty times faster from soil.
Hooper stressed that there are many big gaps in our knowledge that need filling.
He was concerned that commerce is winning out over science in the consideration
of hazards.
Glyphosate, the herbicide used in conjunction with Monsanto’s Roundup
Ready GM crops, targets the shikimate pathway, essential for the synthesis of
aromatic amino acids. Hooper explained that glyphosate inhibits the conversion
of shikimate-3-phosphate and phosphoenol pyruvate (PEP) to 5-enolpruvyl-3-phosphate.
This pathway is not present in humans, but in other organisms.
However, PEP is involved in many biochemical reactions in humans, so there
are many potential areas of damage. It is important for the synthesis of ganglioside,
which is a key membrane component in the brain/nerves, liver, spleen and red
blood cells. PEP is crucial for all energy processes in human cells and for
the synthesis of glucose from non-sugar precursors, especially important for
the brain during periods of starvation. Furthermore, surfactants and some components
in the formulation are toxic and carcinogenic.
Glyphosate toxicity depends on the route of administration, with the most important
route being inhalation and the dermal route also significant. Unfortunately,
most of the testing in animals has involved oral administration, so one must
question how the tests are being conducted. Lethal suicide attempts are 10-20%
successful with as little as 100 ml. However, the manufacturer says that glyphosate’s
acute toxicity is very low, like water, or is not as toxic as table salt or
aspirin!
Consider these realities: Severe neurotoxicity was observed in a 12-year old
girl who swam in a canal with four times the recommended amount of Roundup.
She was completely paralysed, and only partially recovered after five years.
One man developed Parkinson’s disease after one accidental exposure. This
evidence contests the claims that glyphosate is ‘not as toxic’;
glyphosate is a serious neurotoxin. The original neurotoxicty tests conducted
by Monsanto were actually ruled invalid by the US EPA. Hence, bad science has
been used extensively, in many cases, to justify conclusions about the safety
of these materials.
Widespread disturbances of many body systems have been reported after exposure
to glyphosate at normal use levels. Glyphosate is the most frequent cause of
complaints and poisoning in the UK. It has many effects, particularly on the
central nervous system. Common symptoms include severe neurological effects;
balance disorder and vertigo; reduced cognitive capacity; seizures; impaired
vision, smell, hearing and taste; headaches; reduced blood pressure; twitches
and tics; muscle paralysis; peripheral neuropathy; loss of motor skills; excessive
sweating; severe fatigue; endocrine disorders; suppression of steroid formation;
adrenal deficits; digestive problems; nausea; diarrhoea; depression of liver
detoxifying enzymes; nasal congestion and swelling of various parts of the body.
The surfactant used in the formulation also results in misshapen red blood cells.
Hooper noted that these symptoms are similar to those reported in syndromes
such as Gulf War Syndrome, chronic fatigue syndrome (ME), multiple chemical
sensitivity, fibromyalgia, multiple sclerosis and HIV-AIDS. He suggested that
damage to the brain stem and basal ganglia accounts for many of the symptoms
of glyphosate and glufosinate poisoning.
Hooper cited a study by Vogel et al., which used DFP - a tracer compound
- to radiolabel pesticide molecules and follow their movement, in an attempt
to investigate toxicity of combined pesticides (Vogel et al. Env Health
Perspect 2002; 110 suppl: 1-5.) They measured the movement of DFP into
the brain and other tissues, following very low exposure to pesticides. They
found that DFP concentrations were raised more than 20% by minute quantities
of other pesticides. Hence, the data show that common pesticides significantly
change the amount of toxin at concentrations commensurate with normal ingestion
of sprayed foods, drinking of surface water or use of home pesticides. The levels
of the pesticides correspond to the amount that might be found on a single
apple following spraying with these pesticides. The study also provided
evidence of a novel mechanism for the toxicity of pesticides and synergism even
at very low exposure levels. The mechanism involves greater blood-brain barrier
permeability, leading to neural damage and the possibility that other toxins
and even pathogens may obtain greater access.
Hooper also presented evidence documenting glyphosate’s detrimental effects
on human health, to fish, soil organisms, mycorrhizae and nitrogen-fixing bacteria.
Additionally, glyphosate is not irreversibly bound to soil, but re-circulates,
with high persistence in soil and water.
He stressed that the identification of acceptable daily intake is an example
of inadequate science, as the safety factor was arbitrarily determined for a
single compound study, ignoring synergistic increases in toxicity that can arise
from interactions with other pesticides and agents. This can multiply toxicity
by factors of 100 or more. Furthermore, glyphosate accumulates in bone, providing
a basis for increasing accumulation of toxin and shows that clearance from the
body will be partial. The possibility of major disruption of bone metabolism
is also very real.
During the Question and Answer session, Hooper was queried whether GM crops
result in less herbicides. He answered that the data on pesticide/herbicide
use is contested, and where independent studies have been done, there has been
excess use of these chemicals. With the threat of super-weed emergence, even
more pesticides might be used. Results have been variable, but much more data
and evidence need to be collected.
|